Interesting Point

| | Comments (0)

One of my readers brought up an interesting point for debate on the "whom" topid. Personally, I think the debate on "whom" has kind of exhausted its interestingness, but here's the topic anyway: "Resolved: 'Whom' is not a necessary word". I agree with this, but does anyone know of any case where using "who" instead "whom" results in any ambiguity? Most of the cases I can think of are not ambiguous at all because of word order.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Adam Anderson published on November 20, 2003 8:51 PM.

News Flash: Further Proof of Microsoft's Complete Lack of Innovation was the previous entry in this blog.

quotd - once again is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Powered by Movable Type 4.23-en